This seems to be the core focus. This was originally from MSDN but the goal is to find out what was required.

• was it transferred
• was all data complete

Look at using the w3 specification for the signatures.

The general structure of this would be

• Usage
• Examples
• Compatibility

Uses wiki markup. Should be possible to export from org-mode.

This has a fairly extensive form associated with the editing of the pages.

Look at validating the properties.

[ ] alignment-adjust [ ] alignment-baseline [ ] all-space-treatment [ ] background-blend-mode [ ] background-composite [ ] baseline-shift [ ] binding [ ] block-progression [ ] box-decoration-break [ ] box-snap [ ] clip-rule [ ] color-correction [ ] color-interpolation-filters [ ] color-interpolation [ ] color-rendering [ ] cue-after [ ] cue-before [ ] cue [ ] dominant-baseline [ ] drop-initial-after-adjust [ ] drop-initial-after-align [ ] drop-initial-before-adjust [ ] drop-initial-before-align [ ] drop-initial-size [ ] drop-initial-value [ ] fill-opacity [ ] fill-rule [ ] fill [ ] flood-color [ ] flood-opacity [ ] font-kerning [ ] font-language-override [ ] font-synthesis [ ] font-variant-alternates [ ] font-variant-caps [ ] font-variant-east-asian [ ] font-variant-ligatures [ ] font-variant-numeric [ ] font-variant-position [ ] glyph-orientation-horizontal [ ] glyph-orientation-vertical [ ] grid-area [ ] grid-auto-columns [ ] grid-auto-flow [ ] grid-auto-rows [ ] grid-column-position [ ] grid-column-span [ ] grid-column [ ] grid-definition-columns [ ] grid-definition-rows [ ] grid-position [ ] grid-row-position [ ] grid-row-span [ ] grid-row [ ] grid-span [ ] grid-template [ ] icon [ ] image-orientation [ ] image-rendering [ ] image-resolution [ ] inline-box-align [ ] interpret-as [ ] isolation [ ] kerning-mode [ ] kerning-pair-threshold [ ] knock-out [ ] lighting-color [ ] line-box-contain [ ] line-feed-treatment [ ] line-grid-mode [ ] line-grid-progression [ ] line-grid [ ] line-slack [ ] line-snap [ ] link [ ] marker-end [ ] marker-mid [ ] marker-start [ ] marker [ ] marquee-direction [ ] marquee-speed [ ] marquee-style [ ] marquee [ ] mask-type [ ] max-font-size [ ] min-font-size [ ] mix-blend-mode [ ] mix-composite [ ] name [ ] nav-down [ ] nav-index [ ] nav-left [ ] nav-right [ ] nav-up [ ] object-position [ ] overflow-style [ ] pause-after [ ] pause-before [ ] pause [ ] phonemes [ ] punctuation-trim [ ] resize [ ] rest-after [ ] rest-before [ ] rest [ ] ruby-span [ ] shape-padding [ ] shape-rendering [ ] speak-as [ ] speak [ ] stop-color [ ] stop-opacity [ ] stroke-dasharray [ ] stroke-dashoffset [ ] stroke-linecap [ ] stroke-linejoin [ ] stroke-miterlimit [ ] stroke-opacity [ ] stroke-width [ ] stroke [ ] table-baseline [ ] text-anchor [ ] text-blink [ ] text-combine-horizontal [ ] text-combine [ ] text-height [ ] text-justify-trim [ ] text-line-through-color [ ] text-line-through-mode [ ] text-line-through-style [ ] text-line-through-width [ ] text-line-through [ ] text-orientation [ ] text-overline-color [ ] text-overline-mode [ ] text-overline-style [ ] text-overline-width [ ] text-overline [ ] text-script [ ] text-underline-color [ ] text-underline-mode [ ] unicode-range [ ] user-focus [ ] user-input [ ] user-modify [ ] vector-effect [ ] voice-balance [ ] voice-duration [ ] voice-family [ ] voice-pitch-range [ ] voice-pitch [ ] voice-rate [ ] voice-stress [ ] voice-volume [ ] white-space-treatment [ ] word-break-cjk [ ] word-break-inside

• 

Testable JavaScript has ch. 3 devoted to event-based architectures.

• 

Some of the best examples here is in JavaScript Patterns (ch. 4). Don't just indicate what Declarations vs. Expressions (+ named) are but indicate the differences:

• Hoisting
• Name reference

The example that was nice here was a callback pattern: dropping this to something useful is a good idea.

Testing functions in isolation isn't that useful: focus on UI work which has immediate feedback to people not reviewing specifications. However, when looking at the types of functions using Esprima actually might help: by seeing an application decomposed to an AST might be useful.

Focus on the practical impact of the following:

• Types of functions
• Execution
• Scope (and closures)

Why does the closures example use the comma operator if that isn't the relevant example.

The cases should just pick a single style: function expressions seem like the cleaner form. Compare code written in production